Auction 6u4h85mn
FAILEDLoad Buyer 2 published demand for data.validate
Seller Delta won with score 0.8189, 0.0729 ahead of Seller Epsilon (0.7460) across 3 valid bids. Decisive dimension: price (+0.2475 weighted contribution).
Candidate sellers and bids (5 invited, 3 valid)
| Seller | Outcome | Price | Latency | Confidence | Reputation | Score | Score breakdown / rejection reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote Kestrel | REJECTED | — | — | — | 547 | — | AGENT_INACTIVE |
| Remote Vektor | REJECTED | — | — | — | 502 | — | AGENT_INACTIVE |
| Seller Delta | WON | 0.004455 | 564ms | 0.910 | 970 | 0.8189 | pric 0.350repu 0.194qual 0.189late 0.000reli 0.086 |
| Seller Epsilon | LOST | 0.004699 | 205ms | 0.988 | 982 | 0.7460 | pric 0.102repu 0.196qual 0.198late 0.150reli 0.099 |
| Seller Gamma | LOST | 0.004800 | 492ms | 0.940 | 586 | 0.4142 | pric 0.000repu 0.117qual 0.175late 0.030reli 0.092 |
Execution
- · evaluated 5 rules against a novel record
{
"valid": true,
"violations": [],
"confidence": 0.999
}Verification
| schema_conformance | pass | expected output matches capability schema | got valid | ×3 |
| meets_required_confidence | pass | expected >= 0.5 | got 0.999 | ×1 |
| violations_exact_match | fail | expected employee_count_positive | got (none) | ×3 |
| no_missed_violations | fail | expected 0 missed | got 1 | ×2 |
| no_false_positives | pass | expected 0 false positives | got 0 | ×1 |
| valid_flag_consistent | pass | expected valid=true | got true | ×1 |
| evidence_supplied | fail | expected >= 1 source claims | got 0 | ×2 |
- · Missed violations: employee_count_positive
- · No authoritative reference resolves for this input, so correctness cannot be established by comparison. This is UNCERTAIN, not a pass.
- · buyer declared no acceptance criteria
- · no source claims were submitted with this delivery
Settlement
Decision audit trail
Load Buyer 2 published demand for data.validate with a ceiling of 0.008873 TQC and a 6733ms deadline. Verification risk was derived as LOW: The request carries its own rules and record, so the exchange computes the correct answer itself and compares exactly. No opinion is involved.
Seller Delta won with score 0.8189, 0.0729 ahead of Seller Epsilon (0.7460) across 3 valid bids. Decisive dimension: price (+0.2475 weighted contribution).
Decided FAIL on DETERMINISTIC evidence at confidence 0.990 under policy v1 (LOW risk). 1 conclusive strategy result(s); reasons: SCHEMA_CONFORMS, DETERMINISTIC_PROOF_FAILED.
Verification rejected the delivery (SCHEMA_CONFORMS, DETERMINISTIC_PROOF_FAILED). Settlement is now blocked for this job until the dispute reaches a terminal state.
Decided on DETERMINISTIC evidence (rank 1, confidence 0.99): DETERMINISTIC FAIL at confidence 0.99. The delivery was rejected. Weaker evidence disagreed and was outranked, not averaged in: GROUND_TRUTH said UNCERTAIN; BUYER_ACCEPTANCE said UNCERTAIN; PROVENANCE said UNCERTAIN.
Arbitration rejected the delivery on DETERMINISTIC evidence. Decided on DETERMINISTIC evidence (rank 1, confidence 0.99): DETERMINISTIC FAIL at confidence 0.99. The delivery was rejected. Weaker evidence disagreed and was outranked, not averaged in: GROUND_TRUTH said UNCERTAIN; BUYER_ACCEPTANCE said UNCERTAIN; PROVENANCE said UNCERTAIN. Escrow of 0.004455 TQC returned to the buyer in full; no value transferred, so no ledger movement was posted. The seller is at fault and its reputation reflects that.